Samuel Apea-Danquah, the leader of the Yellow Ghana movement, has expressed deep disappointment and outrage over his disqualification from the upcoming December 7 presidential election, alongside 10 other aspiring candidates.
According to Apea-Danquah, the Electoral Commission’s (EC) decision to bar him from the presidential race was based on false allegations.
In a candid interview with Umaru Sanda Amadu on Eyewitness News on Citi FM, Apea-Danquah clarified that he had indeed submitted his running mate’s tax clearance certificates, contrary to the EC’s claims.
He revealed that he had taken extra precautions to ensure the documents were received, sending a copy via WhatsApp and delivering a hard copy to the EC personally.
Apea-Danquah finds the EC’s actions not only embarrassing but also disrespectful, implying that they question his seriousness about running for the presidency.
He feels that the EC’s decision tarnishes his reputation and portrays him as unserious, suggesting that he decided to run for president on a whim.
“We delivered hard copies, and so I don’t even know where this is coming from,” Apea-Danquah exclaimed. “To blatantly lie on national television to embarrass us to that extent, we feel so disrespected.”
He emphasized that he is a thorough person who would not overlook such critical documentation.
Determined to clear his name and challenge the EC’s decision, Apea-Danquah plans to take the matter to court. He believes that the EC’s actions are unjust and will seek redress through the legal system.
Apea-Danquah is not alone in his disqualification. Other notable candidates who have been barred from the presidential election include Bernard Mornah of the People’s National Convention (PNC) and Janet Nabla of the People’s National Party (PNP).
The list of disqualified candidates also includes Nana Stephens Adjepong, Paul Perkoh, James Kwesi Oppong, John Enyonam Kwakwu Kpikpi, Dr. Samuel Sampong Ankrah, Nii Amu Darko, Desmond Abrefah, and Kofi Asamoah Siaw of the Progressive People’s Party.
The disqualification of these candidates has sparked concerns about the transparency and fairness of the electoral process. As Ghana prepares for the December 7 elections, the controversy surrounding the EC’s decision is likely to intensify debate and scrutiny.
Apea-Danquah’s determination to challenge the EC’s decision in court underscores his commitment to democratic principles and the rule of law.
The outcome of this legal battle will have significant implications for Ghana’s electoral landscape and the future of its democracy.
