Ghana’s Education Minister, Dr. Yaw Osei Adutwum, has issued a stern warning against the hasty abolition of the double-track system, emphasizing the potential long-term consequences for students’ educational prospects. His remarks come in response to the National Democratic Congress’s (NDC) pledge to eliminate the double-track system if elected in the 2024 elections.
Dr. Adutwum stressed that phasing out the system requires careful strategic planning, including the expansion of facilities to accommodate more students.
He noted that the government has already made significant progress in this regard through the Ministry of Education, constructing additional accommodation facilities in several schools and gradually phasing out the double-track system.
During a presentation on the State of Ghana’s Education to the clergy in the Ashanti Region on Tuesday, October 29, Dr. Adutwum emphasized the importance of a thoughtful approach.
He explained that the double-track system was introduced to address the increased demand for enrollment in Ghana’s high schools, particularly category A schools.
Dr. Adutwum cited examples of schools that have successfully transitioned away from the double-track system, such as Tamale Senior High School.
He also mentioned Opoku Ware Senior High School, which is likely to eliminate the double-track system in the coming academic year due to the government’s investment in additional facilities.
The Minister cautioned that canceling the double-track system solely for political motives would have disastrous consequences.
He illustrated this point by referencing Prempeh College, where abolishing the double-track system without sufficient infrastructure would deny 1,500 students enrollment opportunities.
Dr. Adutwum’s concerns underscore the complexity of Ghana’s educational challenges and the need for thoughtful solutions.
As the country navigates its educational landscape, it is essential to prioritize students’ needs and ensure that any changes to the system are well-planned and executed.
The double-track debate has sparked intense discussion among educators, policymakers, and the general public.
While some argue that the system is necessary to address enrollment demands, others contend that it compromises educational quality.
As Ghana moves forward, it is crucial to engage in nuanced discussions about the country’s educational system, considering both the benefits and drawbacks of the double-track system.
By doing so, stakeholders can work together to create a more effective and equitable education system for all Ghanaian students.
Dr. Adutwum’s warning serves as a reminder that educational policy decisions have far-reaching implications for students, communities, and the nation as a whole.
As such, it is essential to approach these decisions with careful consideration and a commitment to prioritizing the needs of Ghana’s young people.
