Martin Ayisi, the Chief Executive Officer of the Minerals Commission, has proposed underground mining as a viable solution to address the calls for a total ban on mining in forest reserves.
This proposal comes amidst the government’s recent announcement to revoke the Environmental Protection (Mining in Forest Reserves) Regulations, 2023 (L.I. 2462) when Parliament reconvenes this month.
The revocation of L.I. 2462 forms part of the government’s broader strategy to intensify enforcement measures against illegal mining, commonly referred to as galamsey, particularly in water bodies and forest reserves. These areas have been designated as red zones, where all forms of mining are strictly prohibited.
However, Ayisi believes that mining in forest reserves should be permitted under certain circumstances. Specifically, he advocates for underground mining, citing its potential to minimize environmental degradation. “For me, I think we should allow some form of mining in forest reserves under certain circumstances. Underground mining, I support it,” he stated.
Ayisi’s proposal underscores the need for a nuanced approach to addressing the complex issue of galamsey.
Rather than imposing a blanket ban on mining in forest reserves, he suggests that regulated underground mining could provide a viable solution.
The Minerals Commission CEO draws an analogy with the abortion debate to illustrate his point. “It is like this abortion debate, you will see me raising it there.
There are some people, no matter what, even if the child is raped, by who they don’t know the person, they will say no, you should give birth, because of religious belief.” This comparison highlights the importance of considering exceptional circumstances and adopting a more flexible stance.
Ayisi’s stance is informed by his experience with the Minerals Commission, where he has observed that small-scale miners require designated areas to operate legally.
He proposes that persons whose mining licenses have been revoked should be reconsidered and guided to mine responsibly.
The government’s decision to revoke L.I. 2462 has sparked intense debate, with some arguing that it would effectively curb galamsey, while others contend that it would unfairly penalize law-abiding miners.
Ayisi’s proposal seeks to strike a balance between environmental protection and the livelihoods of small-scale miners.
As the debate unfolds, it remains to be seen how the government will respond to Ayisi’s proposal. The outcome will have significant implications for Ghana’s mining sector, environmental protection, and the livelihoods of thousands of small-scale miners.
The Minerals Commission’s stance on underground mining highlights the need for innovative solutions to address the complex challenges posed by galamsey.
By engaging stakeholders and exploring alternative approaches, Ghana can develop a more effective strategy to combat illegal mining while promoting sustainable mining practices.







